Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Race Representation in Entertainment

As someone who watches an absurd amount of television and is also enrolled in two different classes that tackle the issues related to race, I have been curious about the ways race is represented in certain form of entertainment whether behind the camera or in front of it. A simple look at some of the current most popular shows on television or the big blockbuster movies shows that there is a large underrepresentation of people of color.

In Brittney Cooper’s Salon article “Hollywood’s post-racial mirage: How pop culture got gentrified”, the author discusses how a “post racial revolution” is occurring in the world of television and that a more colorblind approach is being employed when it comes to casting for major roles. She argues, however, that this post-racial way of operating the television industry is not necessarily the definition of progress that needs to happen. One of the most interesting things to emerge in her article is that TV used to be much more racially diverse in the past, at least in terms of black representation, than it is today. Shows like The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, Family Matters, and The Cosby Show (regardless of Bill Cosby’s current sexual assault allegations) were all over mainstream broadcasting stations and were a positive representation of the lives of black people, including the struggles that come with being a member of that racial group. Now, however, black people are being cast in roles that have been gentrified, portraying people who seamlessly fit into a middle class society without traces of racial influences. The character could literally be played by any race because the issues that the role face does not even address them.

Cooper argues that this is not progress. While I think that it is still important to see these people of color playing roles that could be played by any race, it does not get to the heart of the matter. White society is still in power, and those who are not are expected to conform to the lifestyle choices of those who hold the racial authority. Progress would be exactly what Shonda Rhimes is trying to do on her shows (Grey’s Anatomy, Scandal, and How to Get Away with Murder): show people of color in roles that are powerful, vulnerable, complex, and color-conscious. Following Rhimes' powerful example, racial representation on TV might actually start resembling the realities of the people they are trying to portray.

Brittney Cooper article:  http://www.salon.com/2014/03/25/hollywoods_post_racial_mirage_how_pop_culture_got_gentrified/

The Innocence Project



It is often important that we remind ourselves that the Civil Rights Movement is on going. Racial segregation and slavery have been the law of the land for the majority of America’s existence. Policies as pernicious as separate but equal are bound to leave scars that a long time to heal. One of the effects of racial segregation is the racial prejudice found in our justice system. African Americans, especially men, make up a disproportionately large portion of the United States’ prison population. Additionally, studies have shown that African American men tend to receiver harsher sentences for crimes than whites. The Jim Crow south gives us a wide range of particularly egregious examples of racial discrimination in the justice system. Often whites who would attack civil rights demonstrators or even kill them. These criminals were typically not indicted by local courts. Even if an indictment was issued, southern white juries would refuse to convict “their peers”. However, this was not the only result. Black men, objects of suspicion and fear in the eyes of white southerns, were seen as the logical perpetrators of crimes. Just as white juries would not convict whites based on their shared race. Those same juries were keen to convict blacks. This resulted in a large number of black men landing in prison for crimes they simply did not commit. This is not to say that this is simply a problem for the black community. False convictions affect members of all races and especially the poor. Affluence and the skilled lawyers it can purchase, have helped keep the wealthy out of the criminal justice system upon many an occasion. The poor of all communities lack this advantage that the wealthy possess. However, due to racial segregation and slavery, African American men are stamped with an unjust stigma that leads many members of society to view them as criminals. Contemporary society and the justice system has a chance to begin to partially cleanse our nation of some of many sins it has committed by finding those who were wrongfully imprisoned and freeing them. The most prominent of the efforts to achieve this is known as the Innocence Project. The project seeks to free those wrongfully convicted, primarily through DNA evidence. Physical evidence is often kept long after cases are closed. The Innocence Project attempts to obtain that evidence and test it for the alleged criminal's DNA. Should their genetic material not be found in what was believed the time to be their blood or bodily fluid, the Innocence Project attempts to appeal their convictions. The project has had tremendous success freeing 321 people nationwide. Of those 321 61% are African American. The stigma of racial segregation still exists; however in this instance contemporary society has the ability to help deal with its effects. By recognizing that racial segregation continues to negatively impact our society and criminal justice system we can make a fairer justice system and society for all members of our nation. 

Sources:





http://www.naacp.org/pages/criminal-justice-fact-sheet

Body Cameras: A Solution to Police Aggression?


The other day President Obama announced an ambitious plan to purchase 50,000 body cameras for police use. The idea is far from a new one. It has been implemented in several communities for many years. The president’s comments were motivated ostensibly by the Ferguson crisis, in which a police officer was not indicted for the shooting of an unarmed black man, Michael Brown. To many this incident is but one in a long series of disproportionate aggressive actions taken by police against black men. The failure to indict Officer Darren Wilson reminds many of the refusal to convict officers for seemingly any offense, such as the brutal beating of Rodney King for which no one was convicted. The president’s plan appears to take the middle ground. The plan should it be implemented, attempts to curb further police violence by placing body cameras on 50,000 police officers. The idea has been a controversial one. However, the benefits far outweigh the risks. Similar cameras have been placed on police officers to great success. Rialto California, a town of 100,000, placed body cameras on many of its police officers. After the cameras were in placed, the town found that the officers wearing cameras used force 60% less frequently than those without cameras. Additionally, complaints were filed against the officers wearing cameras 88% less frequently than those without. What results when officer wear cameras is a safer environment for citizens and an easier job for police officers. The lack of complaints makes police operations more efficient and the presence of an official video record provides clarity when officer procedure is called into question. At times such as this we would do well to remember that the Civil Rights Movement is far from over. Though there is a contentious history of police brutality against a range of individuals, a large portion of those individuals happen to be black men. This is an unfortunate consequence of racial segregation that black men are often seen as hostile figures, especially by law enforcement, even when they have done nothing to provoke such hostility. Perhaps this can been seen as a direct consequence of the vitriolic rhetoric characterizing black men as rapacious animals that need to be restrained. Damage caused by racial segregation will take decades to heal if not longer. However, the least that society can do is attempt to mitigate the damage done to victims of an unjust stereotype. Placing body cameras on police officers would provide a subtle but effective check on police aggression, which would help ensure the safety of the public, especially black men. At the very least, such cameras would provide the public with clarity should another contentious confrontation with a police officer arise. 

Sources: 




The Fallacy of Reverse Racism

Growing up in the South as a white person, I have heard many different accounts of how my like-racial peers have been victims of "reverse racism". They believe that because they are considered to be racist if they say anything against a group of color that people of color can also be racist if they say anything against white people. For a while I believed that they were correct, that racism can go both ways. However, it has recently been brought to my attention that this is absolutely not the case.

Racism is the idea that one racial group holds prejudices toward another in order to reinforce one as being superior and the other as inferior. Because of this definition, there can never be a case of reverse racism in which a white person is being discriminated against because white supremacy is so rampant and ingrained in our society. Regardless of any remarks that a person of color can make toward a white person, there is nothing that can be said that will truly make a white person feel as the inferior because society is constantly telling them that they aren’t. Sure, a person of color can be prejudice towards white people, which may not necessarily always be justified. However, it is nothing compared to the constant ways that white people make different racial groups feel when they make disparaging remarks because there is no history of total racial oppression to accompany it.

Recently in one of my other course, our professor showed us a video on this very topic, in the form of a bit by comedian Aamer Rahmar. (I’ll post the link below.) In this video, he talks about how his white friend accused him (a person of color) of being racist for constantly making fun of white people in his acts. His friend claimed that if he were to do the same thing toward other races he would be labeled as being a racist. Rahmar’s use of comedy to describe how this idea is absurd took the route of time travel in which he convinces an invasion of Europe by non-white nations instead of vice versa, and the use of policy to constantly make sure how that thiis invaded group would be inferior is the only way this can exist. While truly hilarious, it is also very educational in how racism cannot be turned around back on the group in power.

Reverse racism does not exist, so it’s time for white people to stop feeling like the victim of something that is imaginary.


Aamer Rahmar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw_mRaIHb-M

Racial Inequality and Greek Life

How should the Rhodes Community go about seeking real change in the diversity climate on campus? Perhaps it is through education, or perhaps the answer is rooted in the classrooms. However, I believe that the social atmosphere, and Panhellenic and IFC Greek life in particular, is one of the greatest sources of racial tension on campus, and can therefore be an effective place to start implementing change. 

Much of the Rhodes weekend social scene is focused on fraternity and sorority events such as frat parties, greek formals, and Panhellenic philanthropy events. We attend these events and rarely stop to think about the disproportionate number of students of color, and the possible racial implications behind these numbers. 

It would be difficult to find a Pan or IFC member that would willingly to admit to discriminating on the basis of race during rush. This is because there is not a population of people that actively reject students of color into their organizations based on the race or ethnicity, but rather the problem is that students of color rarely even go through the process Pan or IFC rush, and if they do they are surrounded by a sea of white faces. When the lack diversity is brought up as a topic of potential change, it is generally dismissed as a Greek life norm. 

It is easy for Greek representatives to take this approach when they are not actively participating in discrimination, but the "innocent bystander" approach is almost as detrimental as actively denying students of color entry into certain organizations. This is the mentality that promotes districting segregation, that causes white students to sit on one side of the room while students of color sit on the other side, and allows for segregation in the age of colorblindness. 

We are in a period of time where we must actively seek diversity. It is not enough to passively agree with the foundations of diversity. We must actively work to engage outside of our comfort zones in the name of racial integration, so as to pave the path for positive race relations in the future. 

Color Lines: A Look at the Supreme Court’s stance on Affirmative Action


Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 is not a title that most people recognize. While this recent court case has not captured headlines it decision remains exceptionally important. The decision sheds a great deal of light on where the current Supreme Court stands on issues such as affirmative action. Previously in cases such as Grutter v. Bollinger, the Supreme Court acknowledged and allowed race to be used in college admission. The court admitted that this was important to students eduction. Additionally, it was important to our nation that all races be included equally in higher eduction. This case permitted the use of affirmative action in college admission use. Seattle, though it never formally segregated its schools racially, found that its schools were largely drawn along racial lines. That is not to say that the schools were designed to be white or black, but rather school attendance was determined by one’s neighborhood and for the most part blacks and whites lived in different areas. As such, black and white children attended different schools. Seattle saw this as an issue and sought to address this by using a student’s race as a tie-breaker when considering where certain children were to attend school. Some parents sued claiming that this violated the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. The court was left to ponder whether the need for diversity, which it found compelling interest when applied to colleges in Grutter, allowed race to be taken into consideration for elementary schools through high schools. The court by a 5-4 majority struck down the use of affirmative action in schools. The court was split along all to familiar lines with Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Thomas, & Kennedy striking down the standard and Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer upholding it. Justice Roberts, the author of the majority opinion, noted “the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race”. He argued that as Seattle had not previously segregation children there was no need to use race to assign school admission. Justice Thomas in his concurrence went as far as to say that to use race in the manner Seattle attempted to was reminiscent of the arguments made before the court by segregationists in Brown v. Board. Justice Thomas further went on to note that he takes a view that the constitution is color-blind. He argued that the constitution knows no and tolerates no classes among its citizens. In this decision the court overlooked the fact that our society is not color-blind. The court’s opinion is fine in an academic vacuum; however, America is far from a racially egalitarian society. Black men are still prosecuted and incarcerated at a far higher rate than the rest of society. The income and wealth gap between white and black families remains substantial. One cannot legislate so abstractly when inequality is so great. The court has applied a color-blind standard to a national that is still marred by its history of slavery, segregation, and racial oppression. Though Justice Roberts may argue, “the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race” it will take far more than that for our society to overcome centuries of inequality. Seattle took action because the city authorities believed that there was a problem. Despite never legally segregating students they recognized that their city remained racially segregated. They attempted, in the spirit of Brown and the 14th Amendment, to introduce students to each other in an attempt to ameliorate racial prejudice. As W.E.B. DuBois once noted, “the problem of the 20th century is the problem of the color-line”. DuBois would be dismayed though likely not surprised that the color-line remains a problem if not the problem of the 21st century as well. If we must act within the confines of a color-blind constitution in a society that is still haunted by the very tangible presence of segregation then it appears that that color-line might be here for quite some time. 

Sources: 
Bartleby.com, (2014). Du Bois, W. E. B. 1903. The Souls of Black Folk. [online] Available at: http://www.bartleby.com/114/ [Accessed 10 Dec. 2014].

Law.cornell.edu,. 2014. 'PARENTS INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS V. SEATTLE SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1 | LII / Legal Information Institute'. Accessed December 10 2014. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/05-908.

Law.cornell.edu, (2014). GRUTTER v. BOLLINGER | LII / Legal Information Institute. [online] Available at: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/02-241 [Accessed 10 Dec. 2014].

Letters to a Birmingham Jail

In Martin Luther King Jr’s famous letter to white Protestant clergyman in Birmingham, he wrote while he was imprisoned in Birmingham, King defends the direct actions of the Movement. The white clergyman told King to be patient and to not act, basically to let things work themselves out. King knew the danger of indifference. As a Christian, King knew that the God he worshipped and the God these men claimed to worship hated indifference. “So because you are lukewarm, neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth!” I don’t think this is much clearer than in Revelation 3:16.

Bryan Loritts, the pastor of Fellowship Bible Church, a multi ethnic church here in Memphis edited a book titled “Letters to a Birmingham Jail”. In the foreword of the book, it addresses the general sentiment of America that racism is no longer an issue. “Our President is black”. “Almost no one believes Jim Crow was right”. “Almost everyone thinks that equal opportunity under the law is a good and proper thing”. Then it addresses the facts. “That the U.S. has by far the highest rates of incarceration in the Western world....it offers less medical and family support for the poor than any other Western nation; it maintains inequalities of wealth on a part with the kleptocracies of the Third World…..The US racial history is not solely responsible for these indices of social pathology but that history has contributed substantially to every one of them”.

In this book, Loritts and 9 other men from various ethnicities and ages write essays to Martin Luther King Jr while he is hypothetically still imprisoned in Birmingham. These men know that the fight against racism in the Church is yet to be won. They are well aware that the most segregated hour in the nation is still Sunday morning. And they believe that the gospel of Jesus Christ requires that Christians be moved to action to pursue justice and reconciliation and thank King for his contributions to the movement and the words he has to say addressing the passivity of white Christians during this time, many words that still ring true today.

As a Christian, I believe that one day in heaven, I will be praising God with those from every tribe, tongue, and nation.  I believe God created diversity and that he is a God of justice. The time is again upon our hands to let our voice be heard and stand up for those that have been oppressed and marginalized. I am the first one to admit that Christians have done a terrible job at this in the past, but along with Bryan Loritts and the 9 other contributors to this book, I believe that there is hope for a better day. And that Christians are not simply called to sit on their hands. We are called to be the hands and feet of Jesus, the one that came to right all wrongs.


Eric gardner

We are telling people, that the lives of human beings do not matter, and it's not who you may think, when injustices like these make there way to the forefront.. The people who are no longer living , are immortalized and their humanity solidified. It is the man who kills unjustly who has been stripped of his humanity and is left to dwell in limbo. It is the unconscious act or the malice necessary to unjustly separate another from this plain that strips man.. So people such as Eric Gardner will live on through his given name and the men who will lead an existence and die being remembered by only his loved ones and the people with enough hate to prolong them ..
The fear on campus perplexes me for a couple of reasons, I find it odd that we can say we are a color blind society that has done away with racist practices, but the emergence of a Societal Organization on campus. The Order of the Black Lynx, respectfully referred to as Black Lynx.. I see prejudice, fear, and ignorance come to light when people question what it is black lynx does and how far they will go to get their point across. Ignorance comes from a lack of knowledge and history, to say we model ourselves after the Black Panther party which is a fallacy, but more importantly not fully understanding the purpose of the Panther party was not one of terror, but it is interesting that during the times of their existence when people were being hosed down and shit and killed, the expression of a black nationalist organization is torn down solely and White Southerners share no responsibility or blame .

Athletes and Protests

In response to the recent death of Eric Garner, who was placed in a choke hold by a police officer while he was being arrested, many athletes in the NBA have shown support by wearing t-shirts with the phrase “I can’t breathe” on them.  The altercation between Garner and the police officer was video taped by an onlooker and the tape shows that Garner was saying “I can’t breathe” after being placed in the choke hold.  This is a beautiful thing about the country we live in today.  We can all peacefully protest and stand up for what we believe in. 
            Kobe Bryant, one of the athletes who has worn one of these shirts, was quoted on ESPN.com saying, “It's important that we have our opinions. It's important that we stand up for what we believe in and we all don't have to agree with it and it's completely fine. That's what makes this a beautiful country.”  He brings a very important point to light, and that is that we all do not have to agree on the same topics.  What makes America so beautiful is the fact that one can stand up for what one personally thinks is right.  It does not have to be agreed upon by the American public.  The message here is that people need to stand up for what they believe in to change the culture we live in today.
            It is important for Americans to take advantage of the platforms they are given to speak out for what they believe in.  These NBA players are huge celebrities in American culture and are watched by millions of people weekly on TV.  What better way to stand up for what they believe in than wearing a t-shirt with a simple phrase on it?  These games are nationally televised all across the country.  It is brilliant.  These players have been using the gifts they are given and the opportunities they have to stand up for what they believe is right.  It is something so simple that can have a huge impact.

            We as Americans need to find the talents we have, and use these to change our country for the better.  We are being called to speak out against violence, and racism, and sexism, and so many other issues that plague our country today.  It is in our hands to eradicate hate and violence from the communities we are involved with every single day.   
Mike Brown shooting is controversial for a couple reasons . 1) we will never really know what happened, and 2) it never really mattered. Whenever there is black on black crime we chuck it up to life and survival of the fittest in impoverished areas, but when there is a racial incident in which power is abused or the illusion that power is abused we break out in an uproar. Let me be candid when I say, it never mattered to me what actually happened. There has been more than enough acts of domestic terror has plagued the lands of this country since Black people were free by legislation. So whether Darren Wilson was innocent or not, which he wasn't because albeit Mike Brown was audacious in his attempts to physically engage Darren Wilson, at some point , Mike Brown laid siege and raised his arms in the air. At that point all notions of danger should have been irradiated for a trained official, especially someone who is licensed to carry a fire arm. Darren Wilson murdered Mike Brown not because he was accused of stealing, but because in this day and age , it was justifiable .

Thoughts

Yik Yak has served as a place where cowardice acts and animus for other people can run ramped. This campus faces a long road to redemption as we try to turn this campus around. Rhodes is a school that was founded during the peculiar institution, in Memphis Tennessee, a highly racially charged area that was for slavery. Over the years we've seen racist practices and acceptance become apart of normal and accepted activity as it related to African American students. The first black student to arrive on Rhodes's campus was Colby Smith. A key organizer and never of the notorious group the invaders. As Yik Yak was identified as the Edsel and not the problem, The campus community was forced to look at self, and question did they contribute at all the the toxic racial environment that has been maintained since this Colleges's founding. W.E.B Dubois once said, a government cannot fail a group of people it was not designed to protect.. The true is same for institutions. An institution cannot fail students that were not in visioned by it's founders . If we are to truly tackle the problems we face as a community. We are to re work the very creed and standards by which Rhodes holds itself

Benjamin Watson’s Facebook Post

With the decision not to indict Ferguson police officer, Darren Wilson, New Orleans Saints football player, Benjamin Watson wrote on his Facebook the thoughts he had on this decision.  For those who have not read Watson’s post, I will add the link to his Facebook at the end of the blog, and I would strongly recommend the reading of his post.  This post brought about some controversy due to the simple fact that Watson is a Christian. 
            In Watson’s post, he walks everyone through his many emotions following this decision in Ferguson.  He has many of the same emotions the American public has from this controversy.  He tries to understand both sides of the spectrum, and this is important for many people to see.  He does not understand why violence is the answer.  Watson writes, “I'M FRUSTRATED, because pop culture, music and movies glorify these types of police citizen altercations and promote an invincible attitude that continues to get young men killed in real life, away from safety movie sets and music studios.”  He has an excellent point.  Why does the society we live in today condone violence and behavior that will only lead to death? 
            Watson continues to write about how police officers are called to be responsible for the power they have.  They are not supposed to abuse the power they have.  On the other side of things, Watson is extremely confused as to why the American public continues to disobey police officers, especially when controversy arising from police brutality is such a common issue.  These are just of the handful of emotions Watson writes about in his post. 
            Watson closes his post with a paragraph talking about how he is encouraged because Jesus and the Gospel give hope to mankind.  Watson says, “…ultimately the problem is not a SKIN problem, it is a SIN problem.”  Watson is absolutely right.  It does not matter the color of your skin, we are all sinful beings and we are desperate for help.  Watson continues to write, “BUT I'M ENCOURAGED because God has provided a solution for sin through the his son Jesus and with it, a transformed heart and mind.”  This is the main point of Watson’s article.  The human race as a whole, no matter what color or gender, needs to fight against sin.  The only way we as a people are able to do that is through Jesus Christ.  




Subtle Racism

Recently I read this article entitled “I am racist, and so are you” and in its first couple lines the author, writes, “Here’s the deal. Racism isn’t just guys in white robes and Paula Dean shouting racial slurs. Racism is subtle, racism is insidious, and our culture is so deeply steeped in it that it’s impossible to grow up in the US and not be racist. It’s a kind of brainwashing: a set of default configuration files that come with the culture. It’s a filter, built up from birth, that alters our perception of the world.” I believe the way that Shadoan describes racism is particularly apt. She very correctly describes its dichotomic nature as both a conspicuous and ever present accessory of American culture as well as a surreptitious and poisonous entity that continually and permeates our minds, or rather our subconscious, unnoticed.
The latter character of racism is what Shadoan talks about in this article and this is what I would like to discuss. Shadoan points out that racism is “a filter built up from birth, that alters our perception of the world.” Is this true? And if so, why is it true? Why are our perceptions in this so- called post racial America obscured and tainted by racism?  This filter as Shadoan calls it is not chosen by us but ingrained in us by an American culture cultivated and shaped by its history, a history in which black bodies were brutally oppressed, terrorized and carelessly eradicated for centuries  in the institution of slavery and where black and white bodies were segregated for many more years after that.
These two parts of American history---slavery and segregation--- are the reasons that, we, individuals born and raised in American society, have this racist filter. This seed was planted in slavery, tended and watered during segregation, and now blooms in today’s society. I say that it began in slavery because it was there that black men and women first became designated as “other.” They, with the darker skin and kinky hair became less than their white counterparts simply because they were different. They who once ruled their own lands became the oppressed and down trodden. With this new condition of life that was forced upon them in the New World, they became destitute and dependent on their white counterparts, shut off from the outside world and therefore ignorant of how it works, and reduced to the status of animal and therefore, deprived of all human rights and liberties. After emancipation, when they had suddenly been given all of the rights and privileges they had previously been denied, the effects of slavery still remained. They had not the knowledge to survive in an ever progressing America and so were once again left prey to their white counterparts. Their lack of education and know-how left them as they had been before destitute, ignorant, and dependent.
This image of African Americans--- destitute, ignorant, dependent--- persisted in the days of segregation. In fact, the stipulations of segregation strengthened this image. As we have discussed in class, segregation mandated that blacks and whites be separated in all manner of things, schools, buses, bathrooms, parks, swimming pool etc. This separation allowed these groups to dream up false truths about one another and forced them both to rely on popular myth about the other race rather than fact, hence the origin of stereotypes. Around this time, added to the image of the African American besides that of destitute, ignorant, and dependent, was that of the aggressive black man and the jezebel black woman. The former  used as an excuse to brutally murder the black man in the name of white womanhood and the latter used as a justification for the rape of black women. Though these images were untrue, whites, during the time of segregation, held on to them as fact because it was their only source of information in regards to the black race. They had not yet been granted the opportunity to speak with an African American on more than subordinate terms.
Although today, it is most certainly not unusual to see whites and blacks converse together, work together, play together, learn together, etc  the effects of slavery and segregation still remain. Its damage is done. Although a white girl talks and is friends with a black young man, she still tenses up and gets nervous when she passes another black man on the street. Although, I, a young African-American woman attend Rhodes college and receive the same education that all of my white classmates do, I am assumed to be on the custodial staff here by the white bookstore cashier. Although, I, a young African American woman  work just as hard or possibly harder than my white counterparts, I know that oftentimes I will be judged by the color of my skin and the stereotypes that have so long accompanied it rather than by my accomplishments and the things I have done to defy those stereotypes.  And although, a young man named Michael Brown had no weapon on his person, he was still deemed dangerous enough to shoot to death.
The implications of these statements are very bleak. If our perceptions of one another are still so subconsciously tainted by racism that we cannot see one another clearly even when allowed to interact on a day to day basis, will racism ever be cured?  Or will it ever remain just beneath the surface occasionally breaking free in hostile and violent ways (a.k.a Mike Brown, Renisha McBride, Treyvon Martin etc.)?

 Resources:

Really America?

Recently I came across this article entitled, “Teen shoots dog during burglary, gets 23 years.” The first thing I thought when I read this title was “he must have been black.” I would have like to been proven wrong but, alas, I was not. Ivins Rosier committed the crime at the age of 16 but was sentenced at the age of 18 (when he could be charged as an adult) for, "cruelty to animals with a firearm, burglary of a dwelling with a firearm, and shooting into a building.”  To make sure that my views were not biased by what has been happening lately in Ferguson and with the recent story of Eric Garner, I gave the justice system the benefit of the doubt and decided to look up the average sentence for an armed burglary. To my dismay, the minimum was 5 years and the average was a little over 10 years.

I say this is to my dismay because based on these facts, the young man’s sentence was twice that of the average sentence for a crime like this because he killed a dog. Just let that sink in. Michael Brown’s killer and Eric Garner’s killer were not even indicted but this young man was sentenced to 23 years in jail for killing a DOG. Are dog’s lives more important than human lives now? Or rather I should say black lives. During the interrogation, Rosier’s attorney claimed that a detective "hustled" the boy by equating the dog's death to the "murder of a law enforcement officer."  From this statement we see that the roles have reversed. The dog is no longer seen as the animal but is human and not just any human but a police officer whom, as we know, is given great value in our American society. The black young man has become the animal, the value of his life is depreciated in favor of the dog. There can be no other explanation for his sentence.

In the case of Eric Garner and Michael Brown, the lack of value placed on black life in America is affirmed. The killers of these black men did not receive 23 years to life but were set free. They were not even indicted. However, the 5-year old retired police dog received his restitution. Why wasn’t a self -defense case made on behalf of this young black man? It was enough to get Garner and Michael Brown set free. ARE BLACK LIVES NOT WORTHY OF PROTECTION FROM THE LAW? This is dangerously reminiscent of the time when this question could definitely be answered in the affirmative. One has only to look at the stories of Emmett Till and Sam Hose. Is America suffering a step back into one of the worst parts of its history?

Resources/ Links:


Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Dynamite Growing in America

 
 
In concert with the violence being visited upon black people, permitted by the American government…, the ghettos of America are manufacturing men and women who are becoming more pathological, and far more capable of violence, than the system of oppression in which they are being victimized and bled of hope. The nightmare that America has visited upon the lives of these people shall boomerang, and they will be more inhuman, more insane, than all the years of terror and violence that will have produced them. When this happens America will be struck dumb, outraged. Local, state and national militia will be dispatched to the scene but the scene will be everywhere. White men will be at a complete loss to understand why so many black people have gone mad.
Calvin C. Hernton was a writer who contributed to the Black Arts Movement (c. 1960-1970’s). In his essay “Dynamite Growing out of Their Skulls,” Hernton predicts a time when African Americans will become overwhelmed with the violence and discrimination enacted upon them. They are dynamites fueled by anger and pain, and an event will make them spark and explode with violence.
The riots in Ferguson reminded me of Hernton’s essay. African Americans across the country are aware of the discriminatory treatment they receive. One in three black males can expect to go to prison in their lifetime, and black offenders receive longer sentences than white offenders. The killing of unarmed African Americans was a spark for many who were overwhelmed with the anger and frustration of being mistreated by the American system. When blacks in Ferguson felt that the system failed them in enacting justice for the killing of Michael Brown, they were consumed by their rage and entered a state of madness expressed through riots. Their reaction was a glimpse of the madness that Hernton predicted in his essay. He wrote, “Violence, only violence, smoldering within the dark pits of the psyche, will at once be the tool of liberation as well as the experience which will recreate a sense of manhood and human worth within the souls of black folk.”

Do you feel that the riots in Ferguson were justifiable? Not morally justifiable in the way that western thought teaches us. But that after enduring centuries of oppression and still being haunted by the remnants of social and institutional racism, African Americans are reaching their level of tolerance; and the anger that they are harboring needs a release. If social, political and economic changes are not implemented that anger will explode into violence.
 
“Nothing will stop the blacks, except to kill them. Freedom will not appeal to them, for it will be an irrelevant thing—everything you might offer them will be irrelevant, for how do you give a people back their manhood, their souls? These things must be taken back in the same way that they were lost—they have to be taken back!”
Do you believe that Hernton's prediction for America will come true, even if it is in a less extreme form? How do we prevent that outcome?

Women in the Civil Rights Movement: Is intersectionality always possible?

"There was an all-consuming focus on race. We women were expected to put all our energies into [the March on Washington]... there was a low tolerance level for question about women's participation." This quote was taken from an interview with a woman who participated in the March on Washington. A leader of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference told all the women to simply focus on race, not their gender.

This issue comes up a lot with people who experience multiple layers of oppression. During early waves of feminism, many of the issues were whitewashed and ignored women of color. Because of this, black women felt that they must stay loyal to their race, not their gender. As the movement has become more intersectional, however, women of color have created their own space to discussion oppressions unique to their experiences. We discussed Rosa Parks researching all the horrific sexual violence enacted against women of color, this is exactly the kind of unique experiences I am talking about. Despite this, women were often silenced during the civil rights movement.

The issue of intersectionality came up during a discussion about disability rights and Rhodes United. A student said that his professor expressed the disbelief that all oppressions can be unilaterally dealt with. His professor argued that when you try to deal with too many issues at once, something has to be lost. While part of me agrees with the sentiment that you can't take on too much at once, I think about how the more marginalized groups are often the ones left in the cold when other rights are being fought for. Do you agree with the professor? Is true intersectionality impossible? Does someone have to be left out?

How do we decide whose life actually matters?


For the past year the hashtag “BlackLivesMatter” has become the slogan for fighting police brutality against Black men and women. The hashtag itself is all encompassing, but what about in actuality? Tamir Rice, Mike Brown, and Eric Garner are all Black men killed by white police officers, but there have been many other police deaths since their own. Rumain Brisbon,  VonDerrit Myers, and Deshawnda Bradely are unarmed Black men and women who have been killed in the past few month, but theirs stories have not gained the attention that previous ones have. Gurley was killed by police on December 2nd when the pill bottle in his hand was mistaken to be a gun. Myers was actually in Ferguson, MO at a protest leaving a sandwich shop when officers believed the sandwich he was carrying was a firearm. Bradely was a transgender who had ambitions to attend cosmetology school when someone came to her house and shot her when she opened the door.

These stories are all similar narratives to Brown, Rice, and Garner, yet they do not gain as much media attention. They are acknowledged in the protests and are included in #BlackivesMatter, but the investigation into their murders is not widely discussed in the media. This makes me questions what factors go into a person’s story becoming the over arching narrative. Previously I have talked about the respectability politics that went into the support differences between Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin, but in these cases, there has not been enough attention or information to determine if these are factors.

Is there just not enough room in the media to talk about everyone’s stories, or are there really elements that go into which victims are given a larger narrative? Bradely was a transgender woman whose identity is not widely accepted in Black communities nor in America in general, which could be a reason for larger media outlets not presenting the story to avoid any uncomfortable subjects. Brisbon and Myers; however, were both cingender men who were also fathers, Brisbon having four children and Myers being a young father. Myers death was more discussed in Ferguson because that is where his killing took place.


Does the amount of attention given to each case depend on the community surrounding the victim? Or is it about geographical location and the history of each area? All of these lives and cases do matter, but how is it that some cases become more relevant in the media than others?