Moving from her early childhood into her adolescent years, the first thirteen chapters of Anne Moody’s autobiography, Coming of Age in Mississippi, displays a powerful look at the Jim Crow Era and growing up poor and African American in the rural south. A first hand account of growing up in the time leading up to the Civil Rights Movement, the book is even that more powerful because of the author’s unique perspective. As expected, prejudice pervades every aspect of Anne Moody’s young life and therefore every chapter of this book. There seem to be many types of prejudice in this book thought. Obviously, there is the prejudice of whites against blacks. There is also the prejudice of people with money against people who are poorer than they are and prejudice of lighter-skinned African Americans toward darker-skinned African Americans. Even in the first thirteen chapters, Anne has already experiences each kind of prejudice. The last form of prejudice, the prejudice of lighter skinned African Americans toward darker skinned African Americans, seems to me to be the most interesting phenomenon.
The first instance of this type of prejudice is when Anne’s mother begins to date Raymond. After witnessing the distain that Raymond’s mother, Miss Pearl, has for Anne’s mother, Toosweet, Anne recalls, “They [Raymond’s family] were Negroes and we were also Negroes. I just didn’t see Negroes hating each other so much” (Moody 59). As lighter-skinned African Americans, Raymond’s family looks down on Anne’s family members, who have darker skin. In the book it is implied that Raymond is seeing other women besides Toosweet and that this mother would prefer him to marry a women he is seeing who has a lighter complexion. Although it is not explicitly stated the book, black’s tended to prefer those who had lighter complexions because their skin reflected white ancestry. As a result, we have two groups of people, both systematically oppressed in that they are segregated from the rest of white society, but that are at odds with each other. Not only do African Americans have to fight the persecution from a government that values Jim Crow law, they also have to deal with the conflict that has arisen within the African American community.
Lighter-skinned blacks, whom Anne calls “mulatto” or “yellow,” often try to carve out a higher social status for themselves, despite the fact that they are legally no better off than blacks relative to whites. Furthermore, they are looked upon as better than darker skinned African Americans simply because of their complexion. When describing a women she knew growing up named Florence, Moody wrote that she “was a mulatto, high yellow with straight black hair. She was the envy of all the women on the plantation.” In fact, Moody describes many black people in these first thirteen chapters as looking white: Florence, Miss Pearl, and Raymond among others. The facts that so many blacks look almost like white people highlights how socially constructed these racial distinctions are. For many people, these dividing laws were not based in physical reality. This goes to show that for African Americans, it was not simply your appearance that decides your fate as a second-class citizen. Rather, it is a system of socially constructed rules written by whites to oppress not just on the basis of race but also on the basis of your familial history.
Megan, I really like your analysis of this idea that even within African Americans, there was social hierarchy. I remember in reading how interesting it was to find that Moody, as a child, saw this; she developed these ideas based off of what she saw growing up with her mother. However, it was equally as interesting that as a child she still played with white children, until it was fully distinguished to her why she could not. That being said, I think this idea that a lot is based on familial history only applies within this story. I'm sure there are more examples, but I think that Moody's mom was the only one who was effected by this. Moody herself continued to enjoy working for and being around the Clairbornes and what she learned from them. But, that was probably also a very rare situation.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with your idea that reading the thoughts of a young girl gives the book a particular emotional perspective. Being able to see her develop from a girl into a young adult while reading her thoughts raises awareness of how segregation deeply affected children’s psyche. It is interesting to read how one’s environment changes their perspective of life; we are all born unaware of right and wrong but where we grew up and who raised us have the power to turn upside down your definition of the world surrounding you.
ReplyDeleteThe hierarchy you described within African Americans shows that prejudices were omnipresent in society at the time. Is it not a result of Jim Crow? Could we imply that prejudices are the essence of segregation? As you mentioned, both the black and white population hated each other as they did not know one another. The radical separation Jim Crow installed allowed the whites not to mingle with African Americans and to keep them under control. Whites thought African Americans were inferior because Jim Crow put this preconceived idea in their head since the day they were born. We could say that segregation is the perpetuation of prejudices.
I thought it was interesting to read about the prejudices you listed such as money or physical appearances. Does it not summarize the ones we still face today?
Laura, I don't believe that these prejudices were a result of Jim Crow. Because whites showed often favoritism to lighter-skinned slaves, there has been a long-standing conflict between different skin tones.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I like your assertion that segregation perpetuated prejudices. While this statement may seem simple, segregation instilled in many individuals' minds, especially the minds of children, the idea that some groups are (for reasons unknown to them) inherently better than others. Had segregation not been in place, would we be encountering the same racism and prejudices that cover our society? So many people were raised with the idea that some are inherently better than others, but there is no longer any laws upholding these thoughts. The optimist in me likes to think that because these unwarranted prejudices are not being supported in everyday life, they will eventually be weeded out of our societies.
Megan, I think your point concerning socially constructed norms is very relevant. Your description of the power dynamic between light skinned African Americans and dark skinned African Americans was interesting. I think there is a direct connection of this power dynamic resulting from skin complexion that specifically correlates to colonialism. After spending time in India, this same phenomenon occurs. The English’s colonial past in India resulted in this same sort of prosecution of those with a darker complexion skin tone. There are even skin products that many women use to bleach their skin to obtain a lighter skin tone. I think your point of socially constructed stereotypes in relating to one’s appearance is very relevant and not just confined to the boundaries of American society.
ReplyDelete