Saturday, October 4, 2014

The Rise of Racism in France



France is a pluralistic country, French citizen believe that we can live together in a society, no matter our background, our faith or traditions. The political system represents this aspect as it counts six main different political parties, the Socialist and the Popular Movement parties being the most known and voted for.

During the 2002 presidential elections, two candidates were chosen by French citizen for the second round, Jacques Chirac and Jean-Marie Le Pen. The latter was the representative of the FN party or “National Front for French Unity Party”. His electoral program was based on the expulsion of any immigrant without a regular situation in the country, the repeal of the law allowing foreigners to vote and was supposed to give French citizen the priority to get a job, housing or financial aids while leaving aliens. He was able to get to the second round with 17.4% of the population votes. Fortunately, he did not win the presidential elections with a wide margin; Jacques Chirac was elected with 80%.

However, a flaw was noted on the part of the French political system and its extremist parties. Since then, racist talks increased and were made a commonplace. In 2013, a former minister of the FN party posted a photo montage on internet comparing Christiane Taubira, an African American woman and French worker at the ministry of Justice, to a young primate. She was then repeatedly insulted by a group of young adults yelling to her “Who is this banana for? It’s for the guenon!” during a protest against gay marriage, a law Taubira defended.

The “politically correct” became too important in the French culture. What happened to Christiane Taubira is the result of the trivialization of racist talks happening all over the country. It became frequent to hear a family member, an acquaintance or a neighbor openly say something racist. No one opposes their opinion by fear of being rude, different, or rejected by the community. This silence allows racism to flourish.

The actual situation of the country is due to the economic crisis and the suffering of the population (loss of their jobs, low wages…) and tends to influence people’s opinion. They blame the current socialist government and turn to the opposite party that appears to be an Eldorado and an answer to their distress. This party is the FN. It is lead by Marine Le Pen, the daughter of  the former candidate to the Presidency, Jean-Marie Le Pen. They are trying to put up a façade of a more open-minded party than in 2002. However, the essence of the word nationalism can still be summarized by a feeling of superiority, rejection of other, and independence.
 
This path towards an extremist government seems like a dangerous one as France would lose its original values of being a welcoming land, open to other cultures and part of the European Union which allows European to cross any borders, and to share their traditions and values.

Marine Le Pen is considered a strong candidate for the 2017 presidential elections.




3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Laura, I think you bring up a very interesting point. Racism is still a major global issue. We tend to think of problems in relation to the United States, and while it does serve as a prominent example of nationwide, legalized segregation and racism, the problem is by no means confined to the United States. However, the belief expressed by the traditional narrative which Dr. McKinney discussed in class, that racism ended after the desegregation of schools or the Voting Rights Act, is wrong. We want to believe that this is true, as shown by the Supreme Court's 2013 decision to strike down part of the Voting Rights Act, but events (like the incident with Christiane Taubira) demonstrate that this narrative is incorrect. Racism is still rampant globally, and this reveals the continued need for a global civil rights initiative, as well as the relevance and importance of what we are learning in class about the civil rights movement.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The use of media in political campaigns and politics in general is essential to penetrating the sphere of public consciousness. With the rise of technology and increased access to various forms of social media, the use of media in politics has become of heightened importance. Especially in the political narrative, the use of negative ads or radical messages is much more effective at influencing public opinion than positive ads. I think this is interesting in pairing Laura’s argument concerning racism in France. In her example concerning the comment made about Taubira, the use of negative media specifically influenced the public political sphere. The commonality of racist comments in France I think is important to juxtapose Laura’s original description of France priding itself on being a country of open-mindedness and accepting. Pairing this with the importance of Presidential campaigns is increasingly important. The President is the face of the country creating a type of social norm and relevancy for his people. The increased acceptance of racism in France could have specific policy implication that could effect future generations. Therefore I think Laura is right in that we should be conscious of the way racism and racially driven policies are constituted through our political leaders and the media.

    ReplyDelete