Throughout America’s history, the United States has been
segregated whether de facto or de jure. The Portuguese brought the first
Africans to America in the 1440’s. Although the American colonists originally employed
the Africans as indentured servants racism already existed and the Africans
were quickly enslaved to maintain their subordination. Even America’s fore fathers
believed that their black slaves were inferior creatures. So why did a society
grounded in its historical values decide to desegregate the nation?
Segregation was deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court
during the Brown vs Board of Education of
Topeka (1954). During the case it was argued that segregated school systems
were unconstitutional because it is impossible to be separate and equal. It was
also argued that segregated schools made African American children feel
inferior. Segregation is the product of a racist society; therefore, separation
implies that African Americans are inferior. Why did the Supreme Court suddenly
decide that segregation was unconstitutional? Did white society suddenly feel
as though African Americans were equal?
No. It took decades for all of the school systems to become
integrated. Ten years after the Brown decision, only 1.2% of African American students
in the South attend integrated schools. The Civil Rights Act passed in 1964
criminalized discrimination and segregation. By 1968, 32% of African American
students were attending integrated schools in the south. Opposition to integration demonstrates
that all Americans did not agree with the Supreme Court’s decision to give African
Americans equal opportunities as equal citizens.
Before the Civil Rights Act was enacted, Malcolm X gave his
famous speech “The Ballot or the Bullet.” In his speech he gives reasons as to
why white society would begin to give African Americans equal treatment.
Malcolm X says, “The white politicians will be [in] the Negro community jiving
for some votes… with their false promises.” He recognized that the black
community were being manipulated and abused by politicians for their vote. The white
politicians did not care about improving the living conditions of black citizens;
they wanted to secure their victory in the election. To do this they had to
ensure that African Americans had the right to vote. He argued that securing
the black vote in their favor was the primary reason that white politicians
supported African Americans’ voting rights.
Malcolm X also argued that the civil rights of African
Americans were also human rights. He wanted to “take the case of the black man
in this country before the nations in the [United Nation].” Nations all across
the globe were taking their issues before the UN; Malcom X wanted
the discrimination forced upon the blacks in America to go before the UN too. The United
States would not want this kind of negative publicity. The U.S. is an
international superpower that portrays itself as a proponent of democracy. If
the true, oppressive nature of the nation was exposed to the other countries, the
United States would lose its credibility. Within a year after Malcolm X’s
speech, the Civil Rights Act was passed and Malcolm X was assassinated.
What are your thoughts on the matter? Do you believe that
the nation was gradually adapting to the Brown vs Board ruling? Or do you
believe that Malcolm X’s threat to go before the U.N. encouraged the
U.S. to fully accept integration?
The first question you presented has always rang through my mind. While we in the 21st century know that segregation was wrong, how did the key players in the Civil Rights Movement convince the Supreme Court that oppression--something the United States had done for years--was unconstitutional?
ReplyDeleteI had always assumed that the US gave into peer pressure and gave fair treatment to all citizens because that's what all the other countries were doing. Similar to the ideas we have discussed in class: how could the US claim to be the home of the free when Nazis received better treatment than African Americans?
However, I had never considered the idea of white politicians using blacks to gain more votes and secure their jobs to be the key force behind desegregation. While this theory makes sense, the thought of it disgusts me. It highlights the corruption of politics, and shows how people are only interested in bettering themselves, and not their community as a whole.