Recently in class we briefly discussed Claudette
Colvin, a teenager who did almost the exact same thing as Rosa Parks but did
not become the face of the start of the Civil Rights Movement. Claudette was a
pregnant, unwed teenager. The NAACP did not build a case around her story
because she did not represent the African American community in a positive
light by being a pregnant teenager as opposed to Rosa Parks who was a married
working activist. Rosa became the face of the Montgomery Bus Boycotts, and later
the Civil Rights Movement, because she was someone who held a position in
society that is well respected.
I’d like to take this example of the use of respectability
to compare how something similar happened in the cases of Trayvon Martin, Michael
Brown and many other Black youths who experienced similar tragedies. And finally
analyze how mass media may have played a large role in how they movements they initiate.
The events involving Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown were extremely similar;
however, there was not as much of an outcry or a community development after
the death of Trayvon Martin, Reshina McBride, or Jordan Davis as there was to
the killing of Michael Brown. Right after Brown’s killing the Ferguson
community almost immediately rallied around Brown’s death as protest for the
increasing problem of unarmed African American youths being killed by law
enforcement.
But why was there not as
strong of an outcry over the deaths of Reshina McBride, Trayvon Martin, Jordan
Davis, or even John Crawford who was killed on the same day as Brown? The media
covered all of these tragedies and communities all showed their sympathy and
support, but Al Sharpton did not travel to Florida, Ohio, or Illinois to speak
to entire communities even though he did give speeches and reactions. The NAACP
did not start a petition for justice or civil rights investigation for any of
these other cases, nor did they dedicate and entire page of their website to
updates about the these cases as they have done here: http://www.naacp.org/pages/justice-for-michael-brown.
The fundamental difference
between these cases is the state they were in when they were either confronted
or killed and how the news media portrayed the event initially and in the later
days. The news constantly talked about Trayvon Martin being a problem child for
his mother and how Arizona Iced Tea and Skittles were used to achieve a small
high. Reshina McBride was intoxicated the time she crashed her car, and the
media stated that the shooter mistook her for a robber. John Crawford was and
unwed father, although the media did not largely focus on this fact, it is very
similar to Claudette Colvin’s own circumstances.
When
Micheal Brown was killed, the media and the community quickly rallied around the
fact that Brown was supposed to start college within the next few days. Stories
of his and his mother’s efforts to graduate high school and stories of his
character circulated within his community, social media, and news media. Al
Sharpton and the NAACP immediately showed their support for the Brown family
and the Brown case in itself. A few days after the shooting, the Ferguson Police
Department stated that Brown was a suspect in a strong-armed robber, normally
this would end similarly to Reshina McBride’s case and Brown would have lost
support, but the community still stood by him and his character as shown by the
continuance of the protests.
While
Michael Brown may have not been an activist like Rosa Parks, he had a better reputation
at the time of his death than those who died in similar situations. It seems that
the media’s portrayal of the victim largely affected how much movement was
involved around it. While Brown’s respectability is not the soul reason his
death ignited a movement, it is interesting in comparison to previous tragedies
and those that happened in a similar time frame of Brown’s death.
I believe it's also important to remember that Michael Brown was killed by a cop. I think this adds complexities to the situation and how the community and nation not only came together to grieve, but also to show anger and resentment over the Ferguson Police Department and police in general.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think it's interesting to also look at who chooses how and if a story is portrayed. In the case of Claudette Colvin, the NAACP chose not to portray her case; the Southern white media had little interest. However, in the immediacy of the media of today, they get to choose how (and if) a story is portrayed. Would Claudette Colvin's case be highlighted by the media today? What about Rosa Parks? The media, as opposed to organizations, seem to have more of a say in a story's portrayal today.
ReplyDelete