The
current panic associated with the Ebola outbreak in western Africa, has left
the world grappling with effective measures to contain and combat this deadly
virus. With documented cases in America
and Spain, the confines of this disease have been broken, and its contagious
nature has come to the forefront of American consciousness.
In Michael Gerson’s talk, “Nature
Out To Kill Us,” Gerson directly addressed this issue of the Ebola outbreak and
what he termed, “the global health crisis.”
He rightfully argued that an American would be diagnosed with Ebola
before this virus was contained, which has now come to be true. He also stated that this disease could be
contained in modern healthcare systems such as those in America. By tracing all encounters the infected person
had with other individuals, doctors can limit the scope the disease could
spread by quarantining or monitoring all those thought to have come into
contact with the virus.
After spending time in both rural
and urban Senegal (a country now effected by the Ebola outbreak), I began to
question the idea of biomedical treatment in areas where other, more widely
used, forms of healthcare existed.
Whereas in America, biomedical healthcare is a widely accepted form of
healthcare, in Senegal there are three types of healthcare systems: 1) Qurantic:
prayer and the imam (an Islamic leader) 2) Traditional: a spiritual tradition
through local experts who use remedies, prayer, and rituals, and 3) Biomedical
at hospitals. Usually Quarantic and
Traditional forms of treatment are used before Biomedical treatment is sought
after. In thinking about the Ebola
outbreak, its highly contagious nature, and its now spread into Senegal (although
only one reported case to date), I began to compare these facts to Gerson’s
speech. If Ebola continued to spread, he
argued for more increased biomedical facilities, doctors, medicine, protective
gear, etc. But, purely in the context of
Senegal, I believe that traditional medicine has an important role in the lives
of the Senegalese and further, biomedical treatment is met with fear of the
unknown and further negatively stigmatized.
This is not to say that no one trusts this type of westernized medical
care, however. I think biomedical
treatment has not become as popular because the Senegalese have two other forms
of healthcare that have proved to be effective through generations. So in thinking of Ebola from purely what I
gathered from research and interviews throughout Senegal, I questioned how you
contain a deadly disease while still honoring cultural norms as related to
healthcare, burial rites, etc.? Or is this even possible? According to Gerson, other types of treatment
besides those of biomedicine were not even mentioned in his talk. But how do you change the cultural norm in
order to combat a disease? Do you change a cultural norm in order to do
this? Gerson’s talk left me intrigued
but confused, wondering how to honor these cultural traditions while combating
disease.
Gerson, Michael. "Nature Out to Kill
Us." Rhodes College, Memphis. 20 Sept. 2014. Speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment